| So I wrote this article for our paper, in the issue on diversity, and I figured I would post it on this blog, which I never update...enjoy!
The promise of the new millennium
brings with it novel and innovative concepts about the landscape of our great
nation. Gone are the days of the 60s and
the civil rights movement; gone are the days of Rosie the Riveter. So called “equality” has been achieved, or
drastic steps towards that end have been advanced at the very least—so
politicians say at any rate. Yet, I
challenge you, oh faithful reader, to quantify this “equality” in any
meaningful light. The debate regarding
“diversity” may rage across the nation, but when all is said and done, can
anyone really explain why diversity is important? Ask yourself, why do we need diversity—what
makes it an important component of not only our academic curricula, but our
lives as well? Now take your answer,
strip off all the pre-packaged offal that the media crams down your throat, and
take a critical look at what is left—is there really a viable, cogent thought
there? I wager not! Why then is diversity so reverently
stressed? Because it is the politically
acceptable thing to do. The politically
correct climate of the 21st century has neutered the voice of reason
into a simpering, and often mewling, whisper of unquestioning obeisance to the
whims of the dominant politically correct pundits—the darling gems of the
media—the Wolf Blitzers, the John Stewarts, the *gasp* Tucker Carlson, smug
bowtie and all.
It is high
time we as a people regain our voice, our capacity for reason, and conjure up
the gumption and savvy to pierce through the dogma of the liberal media and
once again proclaim what we truly believe in—what is right! If we truly cannot identify why diversity is
important, save the refuse we are force-fed, why adhere to such a
standard? Simply put, we should
not. Contrary to the popular myth
propagated by politicians and activists alike, so called “diversity” is
actively destroying this country.
Diversity, at one level, is an acceptance and understanding of other
cultures, races, and ethnicities.
Barring nothing else, this as a stand alone concept is laudable. As human beings, we should strive to
understand our fellow people. However,
it is the after effects and residua of “diversity” that we should be wary
about. Unconditional acceptance of other
cultures leads to complacence.
Initially, we may simply strive to understand our fellow Americans—the
blacks, the Native Americans, the Asians.
But inevitably, this newfound appreciation for our fellow Americans will
turn to complacency, the windfall from which will be catastrophic. If the current campaign to spread diversity
to every corner if this land is allowed to run rampant, our acceptance of any
culture, any race, any ethnicity, will eventually be so unconditional, that our
deviant neighbors to the north and the south will infiltrate our ranks and
steal our jobs, our women, our very heritage that we worked so hard to snatch
from the murdering savages that inhabited this great land before us. As if NAFTA wasn’t bad enough, we have to
compound the problem by lowering our natural defense mechanisms and allow our
country to crumble. Do we really want
more Americans to lose jobs? Do we
really want the piety of our women to be plucked away by thieving heathens who
come here to steal our livelihoods?
Shall we allow that third world bastion of sin, Miami (to quote the
venerable Tom Tancredo, who, in the humble opinion of this author, is far too
liberal and left wing), to spread its infectious web of sin and treachery
throughout the farthest reaches of this great nation? I should hope not! I therefore call upon you, my faithful
reader, to stand up, dig into the trenches, and fight the good fight.
Here
at MSU College of Law, we have a 12% minority population. Twelve percent! If nothing else, we should at least fight to
save the future of our law school. So
when Diversity Week rolls around, I beseech you, stand up and proclaim loudly
and proudly the evils of diversity.
Start the conversation with those liberal tree-hugging diversity
supporters; lets see if their argument has any merit whatsoever, or if, as I
wager, it is merely the fluff that we hear day in and day out.
|